Nov 27 2013

Docker 0.7 is here – welcome RPM distros (and anyone else that lacks AUFS)

The Docker project has continued its mostly-monthly releases with the long anticipated 0.7 release, this time making the storage backend pluggable, so fedora/redhat based users can use it without building a custom kernel.

I’m curious to see the performance differences between the 3 storage backends we have now – but I need to assimilate the wonders of Linking containers for adhoc scaling first.

Try it out – I’m even more convinced that Docker containers have an interesting future :)

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Oct 15 2013

easy install of Docker.io on Debian

Tag: debian,devops,Docker,new,virtualisationSven Dowideit @ 9:05 pm

UPDATE: for Docker 0.6.5, the ubuntu debian package also installs on Debian. You still need to enable IPv4 forwarding as below – then re-start the docker daemon

I’ve been doing some work on Docker – learning golang, Docker internals, and just some of the command line options that I didn’t know I needed to know about.

Because I was in a hurry, I threw an old unused disk into one of my old laptops and installed ubuntu. That was enough for me to learn that I wanted to know alot more about Docker.

So, I’m back to using the loaner T530 with my 128GB SSD in it – its been running Debian since the day I got the SSD, over 2 years ago.

it turns out that on Debian testing (with the 3.10-3-amd64 kernel), its incredibly easy to run docker:

sudo apt-get install lxc wget bsdtar curl golang git aufs-tools mercurial iptables
wget --output-document=docker https://get.docker.io/builds/Linux/x86_64/docker-latest
chmod +x docker
sudo su -
#enable IPv4 forwarding
echo "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf
sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf
# set up and mount the cgroup mountpoint
echo 'none /sys/fs/cgroup cgroup defaults 0 0' | sudo tee -a /etc/fstab
mount /sys/fs/cgroup
#OK, you might need to reboot if it fails to mount?
./docker -d &

done.
from there, you can run the docker cli like normal (except that its not in your path yet).

I’m going to pull over the apt pinning installation documentation I wrote for publican the other week and re-write it (and test) for installing docker on Debian Stable, and we’ll all be much happier.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Aug 21 2013

I wonder if Docker can replace Puppet.

I’ve finally spent a little time playing with Docker, and to be honest, the really simple

here’s a list of commands that get run to set up the image

feels awesome.

to test it out, I wrote the simplest steps I could think of to create a working foswiki installation into a Dockerfile:

FROM ubuntu
MAINTAINER    Sven Dowideit <svendowideit@home.org.au>

RUN echo deb http://fosiki.com/Foswiki_debian/ stable main contrib > /etc/apt/sources.
list.d/fosiki.list
RUN echo deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main restricted universe multive
rse >> /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN gpg –keyserver the.earth.li –recv-keys 379393E0AAEE96F6
RUN apt-key add //.gnupg/pubring.gpg
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get install -y foswiki

#create the tmp dir
RUN mkdir /var/lib/foswiki/working/tmp
RUN chmod 777 /var/lib/foswiki/working/tmp
#TODO: randomise the admin pwd..
RUN htpasswd -cb /var/lib/foswiki/data/.htpasswd admin admin
RUN mv /etc/foswiki/LocalSite.cfg /etc/foswiki/LocalSite.cfg.orig
RUN grep –invert-match {Password} /etc/foswiki/LocalSite.cfg.orig > /etc/foswiki/Loca
lSite.cfg
RUN chown www-data:www-data /etc/foswiki/LocalSite.cfg

RUN bash -c ‘echo “/usr/sbin/apachectl start” >> /.bashrc’
RUN bash -c ‘echo “echo foswiki configure admin user password is ‘admin’” >> /.bashrc’

EXPOSE 80

and then I can create the image with a simple:

docker build -t svendowideit/ubuntu-foswiki .

and run that image by calling:

docker run -t -i -p 8888:80 svendowideit/ubuntu-foswiki /bin/bash

Which (assuming that port 8888 is unused on my host computer) means I can do some testing by pointing my web client to http://localhost:8888/foswiki

When I exit the bash shell, which allows me to debug what is happening, everything is shutdown, and all changes are lost. If I make changes, I can commit them, but at this point, I prefer to make a new Dockerfile.

The interesting thing is that Docker seems to create an image tag for every command, so if I make add some RUN lines, or make changes, it doesn’t need to re-do steps that it has done before…. which sounds to me just like Rex, Puppet, Ansible etc – but more re-useable.

And so, I’m curious to see how hard it would be to push out Docker versioned configuration changesets over ssh to ‘anywhere’, with some kind of impotency via system ‘tags’.

 

PS, the docker image is available from https://index.docker.io/u/svendowideit/ubuntu-foswiki/ , and uses my debian packages, so you should install new extensions using apt-get install

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Jun 05 2013

inkChilli wiki to Sharepoint migration tool

Tag: enterprise,foswiki,sharepoint,twiki,wiki,windowsSven Dowideit @ 11:17 am

2 months ago I was asked for help migrating a company’s TWiki site to Sharepoint, and then again a few days later from someone who’s company had declared that they needed to shift their foswiki information to Sharepoint too.

In response, I spent the 2 months researching through much of Microsoft’s undocumented API’s, and implementing a tool to do the job.

If you need to convert from TWiki or Foswiki to Sharepoint (2007, 2010, 2012 and Office 365), please head over to http://inkChilli.com, or email me

 

 

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Mar 01 2013

HTML5 & RDFa-lite semantic templating engines

While working on round-trip html5 <-> Rdfa-lite query and editing, I’ve been struck by the primitive feeling of html template languages. {{mustache}} ,  <%escapes%> <–%ssi escapes %–> all work the same way as C preprocessor macros – string concatenation style – which ignores the underlying structure that we’re working with.

Thankfully, HTML5 is changing everything – it has / will have a template tag

Along the way to finding that, I came across Weld.js (dead?), Transparency or Plates and Pure and not forgetting Knockout.js.

None of them quite goes where I want – as they either use class/id, or their own data- attributes.

What I’m after, is leveraging the already existing semantic annotations of existing (or template tag) elements to add new ones.

For example, I might have the following Link menu, and then want to dynamically add others from a remote query

     <ul id="page-list">
         <template id="page-item-template" style="display:none;">
            <li  typeof="WebPage" resource="/">
                <a property="url" href="/" tabindex="-1" id="index">
                    <span property="name">Home</span></a>
             </li>
          </template>
             <li typeof="WebPage" resource="/">
                  <a property="url" href="/" tabindex="-1" id="index">
                    <span property="name">Home</span></a>
             </li>
             <li  typeof="WebPage" resource="/SvenDowideit.html">
                  <a property="url" href="/SvenDowideit.html" tabindex="-1" id="SvenDowideit">
                    <span property="name">Sven Dowideit</span></a>
             </li>
        </ul>

The following works for browsers that don’t support the new HTML5 template tag:

var node = document.querySelector('#page-list [typeof=WebPage]').cloneNode(true);
node.querySelector('[property=name]').textContent = 'TODO';
node.querySelector('[property=url]').href = '/TODO.html';
document.querySelector('#page-list').appendChild(node);

A nice start, but to me, there’s still something not right with the addressing scheme -
which is where some of the above template engines use the @ symbol to denote that the value should be set on the named attribute.

something like this might work

var node = document.querySelector('#page-list [typeof=WebPage]').cloneNode(true);
node.render( {
    '[property=name]@textContent':  'TODO',
    '[property=url]@href': '/TODO.html'
});
document.querySelector('#page-list').appendChild(node);
but setting up the relationships beforehand, and making the clone implicit
var template = getTemplate('#page-list [typeof=WebPage]', {
   name: '[property=name]@textContent',
   url:  '[property=url]@href'
});
document.appendChild(template([
 {name: 'Sven Dowideit', url: '/SvenDowideit.html'},
 {name: 'TODO', url: '/TODO.html'}
]);

Which looks an awful lot like Weld.js’ (and the inverse of Pure?) API. And, should be trivial to implement using Transparancy.

in the process of thinking it through, I wrote a simplistic version that deserves replacing when I’m thinking about something else:

        getTemplate: function(templateSelector, map) {
            if (this.Template === undefined) {
                var template = document.querySelector(templateSelector);
                var template_map = {};

                for (var key in map) {
                    var address = map[key].match(/^([^@]*)@?(.*)?$/);
                    template_map[key] = {
                        node: address[1] || '*',
                        attr: address[2] || 'textContent'
                    }
                }                
                this.Template = function(values) {
                    var new_elements = [];
                    for (var idx in values) {
                        var elem = template.cloneNode(true)                
                        for (var key in values[idx]) {
                            if (template_map[key] !== undefined) {
                                var node =  elem.querySelector(template_map[key].node);
                                //TODO: detect if key is a method, and call it?
                                if (template_map[key].attr === 'textContent') {
                                    node.textContent = values[idx][key];
                                } else {
                                    node.setAttribute(template_map[key].attr, values[idx][key]);
                                }
                            }
                        }
                        //TODO: if it where a real template tag, apparently there would be an elem.content
                        new_elements.push(elem.children[0]);
                    }
                    return new_elements;
                };
            }
            return this.Template;
        }}
[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Jan 08 2013

TodoMVC written using backbone-forms

I’ve been working on some bootstrap instant edit userinterface ideas, and while integrating hallo.js, I was reading about backbone.js and the VIE create.js RDF form generators.

This lead me to backbone-forms, which auto-creates the backbone view from a model schema…

So to try it out, I wrote a TodoMVC example using backbone-forms – moving almost the entire code into the view.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

« Previous PageNext Page »


Positions by Seo-Watcher
Statistical data collected by Statpress SEOlution (blogcraft).